Commvault Salesforce Backup vs NetApp Backup and Recovery: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Commvault Salesforce Backup

Mid-market and enterprise teams that treat Salesforce as a critical system will want Commvault Salesforce Backup primarily for its multi-org management and sandbox seeding capabilities, which let you replicate production environments for testing without manual work. FedRAMP High compliance and air-gapped immutable storage address the compliance requirements that typically force Salesforce backup decisions in regulated industries. The tool's strength in recovery execution and continuous monitoring (RC.RP and DE.CM) is genuine, though it prioritizes incident response over proactive threat prevention compared to some competitors. Pass on this if your organization needs integrated backup across ten different SaaS platforms; Commvault's Salesforce coverage is deep but the broader platform tax is real.

NetApp Backup and Recovery

Mid-market and enterprise organizations with hybrid cloud infrastructure will get the most from NetApp Backup and Recovery because it handles multicloud backup without forcing you to rip out existing ONTAP investments. NetApp Console ties backup operations directly to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud alongside on-premises arrays, and the Ransomware Resilience data service addresses recovery planning that most pure backup vendors skip entirely. This isn't the tool for teams whose backups live entirely in one public cloud or who need SaaS-only simplicity; NetApp's strength comes from managing complexity across multiple storage tiers and clouds, which creates operational overhead for smaller deployments.