Is NetApp Backup and Recovery a good alternative to Cohesity NetBackup Appliances?

NetApp Backup and Recovery and Cohesity NetBackup Appliances serve similar Backup as a Service use cases: both are Backup as a Service tools, both cover Ransomware Prevention. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

NetApp Backup and Recovery vs Cohesity NetBackup Appliances (2026)

Q: What is the difference between NetApp Backup and Recovery vs Cohesity NetBackup Appliances?

**NetApp Backup and Recovery**: Enterprise data storage platform with hybrid cloud mgmt & data services. built by NetApp. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include All-flash, hybrid-flash, object, and block on-premises storage systems, Cloud storage integration with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes ONTAP for deploying storage into public clouds.. **Cohesity NetBackup Appliances**: Backup appliances integrated with NetBackup software for enterprise data protection. built by Cohesity. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Multi-layer security architecture for cyber attack protection, Isolated Recovery Environment (IRE) deployment, Support for 800+ workloads.. Both serve the Backup as a Service market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Q: What features do NetApp Backup and Recovery vs Cohesity NetBackup Appliances offer?

**NetApp Backup and Recovery** differentiates with All-flash, hybrid-flash, object, and block on-premises storage systems, Cloud storage integration with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes ONTAP for deploying storage into public clouds. **Cohesity NetBackup Appliances** differentiates with Multi-layer security architecture for cyber attack protection, Isolated Recovery Environment (IRE) deployment, Support for 800+ workloads.

Q: Who makes NetApp Backup and Recovery vs Cohesity NetBackup Appliances?

**NetApp Backup and Recovery** is developed by NetApp. **Cohesity NetBackup Appliances** is developed by Cohesity. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.