Cohesity NetBackup Appliances vs NetApp Backup and Recovery: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cohesity NetBackup Appliances

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing ransomware risk at scale need Cohesity NetBackup Appliances because the Isolated Recovery Environment (IRE) actually isolates backups from the production network instead of just claiming to. Support for 800+ workloads means you're not swapping backup vendors when you adopt Kubernetes or migrate workloads, and the multi-layer security architecture addresses both PR.DS and PR.IR under NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if your primary concern is point-in-time granularity for databases; Cohesity prioritizes recoverability and ransomware resilience over transaction-level recovery windows.

NetApp Backup and Recovery

Mid-market and enterprise organizations with hybrid cloud infrastructure will get the most from NetApp Backup and Recovery because it handles multicloud backup without forcing you to rip out existing ONTAP investments. NetApp Console ties backup operations directly to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud alongside on-premises arrays, and the Ransomware Resilience data service addresses recovery planning that most pure backup vendors skip entirely. This isn't the tool for teams whose backups live entirely in one public cloud or who need SaaS-only simplicity; NetApp's strength comes from managing complexity across multiple storage tiers and clouds, which creates operational overhead for smaller deployments.