MiniCPS vs SudoCyber: 2026 Comparison
MiniCPS is a free cyber range training tool. SudoCyber is a commercial cyber range training tool by SudoCyber. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building or testing industrial control system defenses need MiniCPS because it lets you simulate actual PLC behavior and network traffic together, something most cyber ranges bolt on as an afterthought. The framework is free and open source with active development (179 GitHub stars), which matters when you're iterating on ICS-specific attack scenarios that commercial tools won't let you customize. Skip this if your organization needs a polished UI and instructor dashboards; MiniCPS rewards teams comfortable with command-line setup and building their own training workflows around the simulation engine.
Security teams building a cybersecurity workforce from scratch should choose SudoCyber for its hands-on lab environment that actually forces people to break things and fix them, not just click through modules. The platform covers CompTIA Security+, Network+, and CEH certifications while offering Capture the Flag competitions that make training stick better than passive content; it directly strengthens NIST CSF 2.0's Awareness and Training function. Skip this if your org needs enterprise-scale role-based learning paths or integration with your existing LMS; SudoCyber's strength is depth in technical skills for smaller teams, not breadth across hundreds of users with different compliance requirements.
