Menlo Security Browsing Forensics vs Packet Capture (cStor®): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Incident response teams investigating browser-based attacks and insider threats need Menlo Security Browsing Forensics because it reconstructs exactly what happened in a user session,keystrokes, GenAI tool interactions, and all,without relying on fragmented logs or user memory. The keyboard capture and video-like replay directly support NIST RS.AN incident analysis, turning forensic friction into a timeline you can actually audit. Skip this if your organization rarely investigates user sessions or lacks the cloud infrastructure to store encrypted recordings at scale; browser forensics only matters if you're actually going to use it. Enterprise and mid-market security teams investigating protocol-level incidents will find Packet Capture (cStor®) invaluable for its lossless capture at 10–200 Gbps paired with petabyte-scale persistent storage, letting you replay and forensically analyze traffic weeks or months after compromise. The onboard indexing and Wireshark integration mean you're not shipping raw PCAPs offsite for analysis; incident response happens at wire speed with full packet fidelity. This is deliberate forensics tooling, not a detection platform; if you need real-time threat hunting or automated anomaly flagging across the network, you'll want this feeding data to a separate NDR layer.