Anchore Enforce vs m9sweeper: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Anchore Enforce is a commercial container security tool by Anchore. m9sweeper is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.
Platform teams managing multiple Kubernetes clusters on a budget will find m9sweeper valuable because it bundles industry-standard open source utilities into a working security baseline without vendor lock-in or licensing costs. The free model and 265 GitHub stars indicate active community validation for detecting misconfigurations and runtime policy violations across clusters. Skip this if you need commercial support SLAs or a UI-first experience; m9sweeper requires comfort with open source tooling and some manual integration work.
