CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile vs Lookout Mobile EDR: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile

Startups and SMBs with BYOD programs should pick CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile because it runs continuous vulnerability scans on employee devices without touching personal data, a rare combination that actually passes privacy review. The tool covers NIST asset management and continuous monitoring (DE.CM) across both iOS and Android through native app deployment, with policy distribution and read receipts built in so you know what's actually enforced. Skip this if you need deep integration with enterprise UEM platforms beyond MDM compatibility, or if your threat model includes sophisticated nation-state actors; the focus here is misconfigurations and malicious apps, not advanced persistent intrusion.

Lookout Mobile EDR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing mixed device fleets (iOS, Android, managed, unmanaged, BYOD) need Lookout Mobile EDR because it catches credential theft and risky app behavior in real time while maintaining forensic data for incident investigation, covering the full arc from continuous monitoring through incident analysis. The platform integrates directly into SIEM and SOAR workflows, meaning SOC analysts can act on mobile threats without context switching. Skip this if your organization runs only corporate-owned devices with restrictive MDM policies; the value proposition assumes you're managing device diversity and need threat response automated, not just visibility.