Liffy vs Vulneri Pentest: 2026 Comparison
Liffy is a free penetration testing tool. Vulneri Pentest is a commercial penetration testing tool by Vulneri. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers running manual assessments against legacy applications will find Liffy invaluable for LFI exploitation; it handles filter bypass and log poisoning chains that require tedious manual crafting. The 884 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect adoption among red teams who need a focused, scriptable tool rather than bloated frameworks. Skip this if you're looking for a GUI-driven scanner or need coverage beyond file inclusion vulnerabilities; Liffy is deliberately narrow and expects operator skill.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need continuous pentest coverage without waiting for external vendors will find Vulneri Pentest's automated asset discovery and controlled exploitation workflow cuts remediation cycles significantly. The platform maps to NIST ID.RA and ID.AM functions with black-box, gray-box, and white-box testing modes, then ties findings directly to business impact scoring so your team prioritizes what actually matters. Skip this if your organization requires on-premise deployment or needs in-house pentest teams augmented rather than replaced; Vulneri is purpose-built as a continuous alternative to annual engagements, not a supplement to them.
