Labris UTM vs Safing Portmaster: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Labris UTM is a commercial next-generation firewalls tool by Labris Networks. Safing Portmaster is a free next-generation firewalls tool by Safing. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best next-generation firewalls fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
SMBs and mid-market shops that need perimeter security without the complexity or cost of point tools will get real value from Labris UTM; the appliance bundles firewall, IPS, VPN, and email security with centralized policy management that actually keeps configuration drift minimal across multiple sites. The vendor's focus on continuous monitoring and platform security (NIST PR.PS and DE.CM) means you get solid visibility into what's crossing your boundary and what's happening inside the box itself. Skip this if you're running a hybrid-cloud architecture where you need deep east-west segmentation or API-driven threat response; Labris is built for perimeter-first networks, not zero-trust micro-segmentation.
Startups and individual security practitioners who need granular per-application network control without licensing friction should use Safing Portmaster; it's free, open-source, and runs locally so you own the ruleset and logs. The tool covers NIST DE.CM continuous monitoring of network anomalies and PR.IR infrastructure resilience through application-level firewall rules, kill switch, and encrypted DNS, giving you visibility most OS firewalls skip. Skip this if your team expects vendor support, cloud-native orchestration, or centralized policy management across dozens of endpoints; Portmaster is single-machine focused and backed by a two-person team in Austria.
