Digital Type vs Kymatio HRM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Digital Type is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by TNK. Kymatio HRM is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by Kymatio. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best user and entity behavior analytics fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startup security teams managing insider risk without dedicated headcount should start with Digital Type, since its behavioral science layer catches risky user patterns that traditional access controls miss. The platform covers five NIST CSF 2.0 areas including continuous monitoring and risk assessment, and deployment takes weeks not months on cloud infrastructure. Skip this if you need deep forensics or incident response automation; Digital Type is built for prevention and early warning, not post-breach investigation.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing incidents and insider risk alerts will find value in Kymatio HRM's ability to surface which users actually pose material risk instead of treating all behavioral anomalies equally. The platform's continuous monitoring and risk prioritization directly address NIST ID.RA and PR.AT, meaning you get both the visibility to assess human cyber risk and the dashboards to justify awareness training spend to the board. Skip this if your organization runs a mature security culture program already; Kymatio assumes behavioral baseline data takes weeks to establish, which catches most mid-market teams off guard.
