Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Keycloak is a commercial access management tool by Keycloak. ZITADEL is a commercial ciam tool by ZITADEL. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best access management fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Startups and mid-market teams building custom applications need Keycloak because it's open-source IAM you can actually modify without vendor lock-in, and self-host it on infrastructure you already control. The tool supports OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML protocols out of the box, plus passkey-based MFA and multi-tenancy through its Organizations feature, covering NIST CSF 2.0's Identity Management function without licensing per user. Skip this if your organization needs managed SaaS convenience and hands-off operations; Keycloak requires DevOps capacity to deploy, patch, and maintain in production.
Open-source IAM solution for SSO, MFA, and identity federation
Open-source, multi-tenant identity platform for authn, authz, and SSO.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Keycloak vs ZITADEL for your access management needs.
Keycloak: Open-source IAM solution for SSO, MFA, and identity federation. built by Keycloak. Core capabilities include Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication with passkeys and recovery codes, Identity federation with external providers..
ZITADEL: Open-source, multi-tenant identity platform for authn, authz, and SSO. built by ZITADEL. Core capabilities include Hosted login page with customizable branding, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement, Passwordless authentication via Passkeys..
Both serve the Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Both tools share capabilities in single sign-on (sso). Keycloak differentiates with Multi-factor authentication with passkeys and recovery codes, Identity federation with external providers, OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0 protocol support. ZITADEL differentiates with Hosted login page with customizable branding, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement, Passwordless authentication via Passkeys.
Keycloak is developed by Keycloak. ZITADEL is developed by ZITADEL. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Keycloak and ZITADEL serve similar Access Management use cases: both cover Authentication, Authorization, MFA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox