Kenzo Identity Risk Engine vs Permiso Identity Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Kenzo Identity Risk Engine

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in identity alerts will cut through noise with Kenzo Identity Risk Engine because it correlates user behavior across your entire stack,cloud accounts, workstations, email, SSO, SaaS,into a single risk score instead of forcing you to chase fifty disconnected signals. The agentic AI baseline modeling catches low and slow attacks that signature tools miss, and the platform scores strongly on NIST DE.CM and DE.AE continuous monitoring and analysis functions. Skip this if you need identity governance or access control enforcement; Kenzo is purely detection and response, not provisioning.

Permiso Identity Security

Teams managing AI workloads across multiple cloud environments need Permiso Identity Security because it's the only platform that treats AI agents as first-class identity threats alongside human users and service accounts. The Universal Identity Graph spans IaaS, SaaS, and identity providers while flagging shadow AI activity and prompt manipulation attacks that traditional ITDR tools completely miss. This is less relevant for organizations still in early AI adoption or those wanting a lightweight identity governance tool; Permiso requires active threat hunting to justify its cost.