Keep Aware vs Zip Identity and Access Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Keep Aware: Agentless browser security platform for threat detection and DLP. built by Keep Aware. Core capabilities include Agentless deployment directly into existing browsers without proxying or tunneling, Real-time cross-browser visibility into page visits, extension events, and data transfers, Out-of-the-box pre-configured security profiles for phishing, credential theft, and data leakage..

Zip Identity and Access Management: IAM platform for MFA rollout, session monitoring, and multi-company management. built by Zip Security. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication rollout with customizable email templates, MFA adoption monitoring and visibility, Account session monitoring and detection of unexpected sessions..

Both serve the Identity Threat Detection and Response market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Keep Aware differentiates with Agentless deployment directly into existing browsers without proxying or tunneling, Real-time cross-browser visibility into page visits, extension events, and data transfers, Out-of-the-box pre-configured security profiles for phishing, credential theft, and data leakage. Zip Identity and Access Management differentiates with Multi-factor authentication rollout with customizable email templates, MFA adoption monitoring and visibility, Account session monitoring and detection of unexpected sessions.

Keep Aware is developed by Keep Aware. Zip Identity and Access Management is developed by Zip Security. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Keep Aware and Zip Identity and Access Management serve similar Identity Threat Detection and Response use cases: both are Identity Threat Detection and Response tools, both cover Visibility. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.