jwt-cracker vs jwt-heartbreaker: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
jwt-cracker is a free penetration testing tool. jwt-heartbreaker is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and security researchers validating JWT implementations in development and staging environments should reach for jwt-cracker first; its simplicity means you're testing the actual weakness, not fighting the tool. With 1,131 GitHub stars and zero dependencies, it's lightweight enough to run inline in CI/CD pipelines or during code review phases. Skip this if you're hunting vulnerabilities in production tokens under time pressure or need to crack keys stronger than basic brute force can handle; for that work, you'll need something with GPU acceleration and dictionary optimization.
Penetration testers and AppSec engineers who routinely audit REST APIs will find jwt-heartbreaker indispensable for JWT validation testing inside Burp; it automates the tedious checks for unsigned tokens, weak secrets, and algorithm confusion that manual review misses. The 135 GitHub stars and active maintenance show real adoption among practitioners who integrate it into their standard Burp workflows rather than reaching for heavier, closed-source alternatives. Skip this if your threat model doesn't involve JWT-authenticated APIs or if you need post-exploitation JWT manipulation; jwt-heartbreaker focuses narrowly on the discovery and validation phase.
