Iru AI vs UserLock: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Iru AI is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Iru. UserLock is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by IS Decisions. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Apple, Windows, and Android devices will gain most from Iru AI's passwordless authentication tied to device identity, which eliminates the credential-stuffing surface area that plagues traditional MFA deployments. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM strongly through device-bound authentication and continuous endpoint monitoring, plus its compliance automation with evidence collection reduces audit labor substantially. Skip this if you need mature incident response and forensics capabilities; Iru's strength is prevention and continuous compliance, not RS.AN depth.
SMB and mid-market teams managing on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments need UserLock for context-aware access control that blocks compromised credentials even after MFA bypass. The tool maps directly to NIST PR.AA by enforcing device posture and location checks before granting logon, not just at initial authentication. Skip this if your infrastructure is cloud-native or you lack Active Directory as a core identity system; UserLock's value collapses without AD to anchor on.
