ExploitDB vs InternalBlue: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ExploitDB is a free penetration testing tool. InternalBlue is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teams validating their attack surface need ExploitDB for its indexed proof-of-concept code tied directly to CVEs; you'll spend less time hunting GitHub for working exploits and more time running them. The archive covers over 20,000 public exploits with active maintenance, which matters when you're building a test plan against known vulnerabilities. Skip this if your org needs exploit intelligence abstracted into risk ratings or automated scanning; ExploitDB is a reference library, not a vulnerability scanner.
Bluetooth security researchers and red teams testing Broadcom chipsets should choose InternalBlue for direct firmware-level access that commercial tools simply don't provide; the 745 GitHub stars reflect active community validation of its attack primitives. This is genuinely free and requires no licensing friction, which matters when you're iterating on exploit chains. Skip this if you need GUI-driven penetration testing or support for non-Broadcom wireless stacks; InternalBlue is command-line research infrastructure, not a commercial pentest platform.
