Hypernative Firewall vs Prophaze API Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Hypernative Firewall

Protocol teams and DeFi platforms need Hypernative Firewall because it stops malicious transactions before they execute, not after they drain liquidity. The firewall operates at 7K gas per check, making it economical enough to run on every transaction, and its execution logic analysis catches exploit patterns that simple allowlist filtering misses. Skip this if your organization needs post-incident forensics or cross-chain orchestration; Hypernative prioritizes real-time blocking on a single chain and assumes you can tolerate the operational overhead of managing client-defined rulesets.

Prophaze API Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in API sprawl should start with Prophaze API Security; its AI-driven discovery actually finds shadow APIs that static scanning misses, which matters because most breaches exploit undocumented endpoints. The platform covers NIST PR.AA (access control) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) with real-time threat detection across REST, GraphQL, and gRPC, plus native CI/CD integration so you're not bolting security on after deployment. Skip this if you need SIEM-grade incident response or custom threat hunting; Prophaze is built to stop API abuse at scale, not investigate forensics.