Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP) vs Zygon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP)

Security teams drowning in shadow SaaS discovery will actually solve the problem with Grip SSCP because it finds and governs unfederated apps that your SSO logs completely miss, then automates the remediation instead of dumping a spreadsheet on your desk. Deploys agentless in under 10 minutes and covers both NIST ID.AM and PR.AA without requiring you to rip out your existing Okta setup. Skip this if you only care about federated SaaS apps or you need MFA enforcement to work across your entire identity stack today; Grip is strongest where your governance is weakest.

Zygon

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in SaaS sprawl will appreciate Zygon's ability to discover and govern cloud identities without waiting for API integrations; the browser extension ingests user lists directly from apps that lack connectors, which matters when you're managing dozens of shadow IT applications. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA and ID.AM, meaning it handles access control enforcement and asset tracking in a single place rather than forcing you to stitch together separate tools. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premise directory services or needs deep integration with legacy identity providers; Zygon is built for cloud-first shops.