GQUIC Protocol Analyzer vs RDFP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
GQUIC Protocol Analyzer is a free network detection and response tool. RDFP is a free network detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Network defenders who need visibility into Google's QUIC traffic without deploying expensive commercial sensors will find GQUIC Protocol Analyzer worth the setup time; it extracts connection metadata and behavioral fingerprints that catch anomalies most teams miss because they're not actually parsing the protocol. Zeek integration means you're working within existing detection pipelines, and the 80 GitHub stars signal it's being used in production shops, not abandoned after one release. Skip this if you need turnkey deployment or real-time alerting baked in; this is a parsing tool that requires you to own the detection logic downstream.
Security teams running Zeek for network visibility will find immediate value in RDFP for identifying unauthorized or outdated Remote Desktop clients on the wire, something most NDR platforms treat as noise rather than a detection signal. The script requires no additional infrastructure beyond existing Zeek deployments and costs nothing, making it a quick add to detect client-side RDP vulnerabilities that endpoint tools often miss. Skip this if your organization relies on application allowlisting or has already eliminated RDP from your environment; RDFP is tactical network hygiene, not a replacement for access controls.
