genua Remote Maintenance vs Seckiot Explore & Citadelle: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

genua Remote Maintenance

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed maintenance access across critical industrial networks should pick genua Remote Maintenance because it enforces Zero Trust at the remote session layer, not just at the perimeter. The vendor's Security by Design architecture and explicit support for privileged access management mean you're not bolting trust controls onto a legacy remote tool. This is not for organizations seeking a single pane of glass across IT and OT security; genua focuses narrowly on the remote maintenance use case and assumes you already have asset monitoring and detection tooling in place.

Seckiot Explore & Citadelle

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting critical infrastructure need asset discovery and continuous monitoring that actually maps OT networks instead of treating them like IT afterthoughts; Seckiot Explore & Citadelle does this across multiple industrial sectors with on-premises deployment that doesn't require cloud connectivity. The platform covers three core NIST CSF 2.0 functions,asset management, continuous monitoring, and infrastructure resilience,which means it prioritizes visibility and detection but won't solve your incident response automation or recovery orchestration. Skip this if your organization runs mostly IT operations or needs a single console for both OT and IT; this is purpose-built for shops where OT asset visibility is the blocking problem.