enclaive Dyneemas Confidential K8s vs Forum Systems Sentry: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

enclaive Dyneemas Confidential K8s

Enterprise teams deploying Kubernetes across hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructure will get the most from enclaive Dyneemas Confidential K8s because hardware-based secure enclaves protect containerized workloads from host-level compromise, a threat model most standard CNAPPs don't address. The platform covers four of NIST CSF 2.0's core Protect and Detect functions, with particular strength in access control and continuous monitoring through cryptographically verifiable workload identities. Not a fit for teams prioritizing cost-effective security or those without hybrid cloud commitments; the complexity and licensing overhead favor organizations where confidentiality risk justifies the operational investment.

Forum Systems Sentry

Teams deploying Docker microservices in multi-tenant or compliance-heavy environments should pick Forum Systems Sentry for its Zero Trust enforcement at the node level, which blocks lateral movement without requiring application code changes. The tool covers all four NIST CSF 2.0 foundational functions (Identity Management, Platform Security, Infrastructure Resilience, and Continuous Monitoring), with particular strength in PR.AA access control and east-west traffic isolation. Skip this if your infrastructure is primarily Kubernetes-native; Sentry's Docker-centric design means you'll outgrow it as you scale beyond containerized microservices into orchestrated clusters.