What features do Black Duck Black Duck SCA vs Fluid Attacks SCA offer?

**Black Duck Black Duck SCA** differentiates with Dependency analysis for direct and transitive dependencies, Binary analysis for post-build artifacts, Codeprint analysis for AI models and undeclared dependencies. **Fluid Attacks SCA** differentiates with Dependency tree mapping and visualization, Continuous scanning for vulnerable third-party libraries, Component and dependency inventory generation.

Who makes Black Duck Black Duck SCA vs Fluid Attacks SCA?

**Black Duck Black Duck SCA** is developed by Black Duck Software, Inc.. **Fluid Attacks SCA** is developed by Fluid Attacks. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Black Duck Black Duck SCA a good alternative to Fluid Attacks SCA?

Black Duck Black Duck SCA and Fluid Attacks SCA serve similar Software Composition Analysis use cases: both are Software Composition Analysis tools, both cover CI/CD, Dependency Scanning, SBOM. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Black Duck Black Duck SCA vs Fluid Attacks SCA: 2026 Comparison Guide

Q: What is the difference between Black Duck Black Duck SCA vs Fluid Attacks SCA?

**Black Duck Black Duck SCA**: SCA tool for managing security, quality, and license risks in open source code. built by Black Duck Software, Inc.. Core capabilities include Dependency analysis for direct and transitive dependencies, Binary analysis for post-build artifacts, Codeprint analysis for AI models and undeclared dependencies.. **Fluid Attacks SCA**: SCA tool for identifying vulnerable third-party libraries and dependencies. built by Fluid Attacks. Core capabilities include Dependency tree mapping and visualization, Continuous scanning for vulnerable third-party libraries, Component and dependency inventory generation.. Both serve the Software Composition Analysis market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.