FireEye Detection On Demand vs URL Scan: 2026 Comparison
FireEye Detection On Demand is a commercial network sandboxing tool by FireEye. URL Scan is a free network sandboxing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network sandboxing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams needing fast, authoritative malware verdicts on suspicious files and URLs should run them through FireEye Detection On Demand before deciding whether to block or investigate further. The cloud API processes submissions through FireEye's actual execution engine rather than signature matching alone, giving you analysis depth typically reserved for expensive incident response retainers. Skip this if your team lacks API integration bandwidth or needs behavioral analysis of binaries already running on endpoints; Detection On Demand is triage and verification, not continuous monitoring.
Security teams that need fast, repeatable intelligence on suspicious links before clicking will find URL Scan's sandbox useful for threat triage; it's free, requires no deployment, and gives you visual site behavior alongside file detonation results. The tool excels at NIST Detect functions,flag malicious domains and phishing pages in seconds,but don't expect deep recovery guidance or integration hooks into your incident response workflow. Skip this if you're hunting for a managed threat intelligence feed or automated URL blocking; URL Scan is a lookup tool, not a prevention layer.
