Filigran OpenAEV vs SafeBreach Validate: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Filigran OpenAEV: Open-source threat-informed exposure validation platform for attack simulation. built by Filigran. Core capabilities include Threat intelligence-driven attack scenario creation, MITRE ATT&CK-based simulation library, Agentless EDR integration (bring your own EDR)..

SafeBreach Validate: Breach and attack simulation platform for testing security controls. built by SafeBreach. Core capabilities include Automated breach and attack simulation across kill chain, Lightweight simulators for network, cloud, and endpoint deployment, Attack scenario orchestration via management console..

Both serve the Threat Simulation market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Filigran OpenAEV differentiates with Threat intelligence-driven attack scenario creation, MITRE ATT&CK-based simulation library, Agentless EDR integration (bring your own EDR). SafeBreach Validate differentiates with Automated breach and attack simulation across kill chain, Lightweight simulators for network, cloud, and endpoint deployment, Attack scenario orchestration via management console.

Filigran OpenAEV is developed by Filigran. SafeBreach Validate is developed by SafeBreach. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Filigran OpenAEV integrates with OpenCTI, EDR platforms. SafeBreach Validate integrates with SIEM, SOAR. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

Filigran OpenAEV and SafeBreach Validate serve similar Threat Simulation use cases: both are Threat Simulation tools, both cover MITRE Attack, Security Validation. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.