Exaforce Exabot Triage vs Query.AI Query Agents: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Exaforce Exabot Triage

Security teams drowning in alert noise from disparate SIEM and EDR tools should pick Exaforce Exabot Triage for its ability to collapse duplicate alerts and strip false positives before they reach your analysts, cutting triage toil by 40-60 percent in typical deployments. The platform's attack chain correlation across multiple sources and business context rules mean your junior analysts get fewer, higher-fidelity incidents to investigate, directly addressing the DE.AE and RS.MA gaps in most organizations. Skip this if your stack is homogeneous or you're primarily concerned with response automation; Exabot assumes you're already swimming in multi-source alerts and need a purpose-built intake layer, not a one-tool-fits-all platform.

Query.AI Query Agents

SOC teams drowning in alert noise need Query.AI Query Agents for one reason: it cuts triage time by automating the grunt work of evidence collection and context-building that analysts waste hours on today. The federated data mesh architecture means you're querying asset profiles, file hashes, network logs, and threat intel simultaneously without moving data, and the normalized AI-ready payloads push accuracy up where most SOAR tools fumble. Skip this if your team runs a mature incident response operation with custom automation already in place; Query Agents is built for organizations still manually pulling disparate data sources into spreadsheets during investigations.