Critical Path Security Léargas Platform vs Exabeam NetMon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Critical Path Security Léargas Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need full protocol visibility without sacrificing deployment flexibility should evaluate Léargas Platform; its Zeek foundation delivers deterministic network traffic analysis across physical, virtual, and cloud footprints, and the native support for Splunk, AWS, GCP, and infrastructure-as-code tools means it integrates into existing stacks without forcing rip-and-replace decisions. The platform prioritizes detection and continuous monitoring over response automation, which aligns well with organizations that have mature SIEM investments and want to strengthen their network layer rather than consolidate everything into a single vendor. Skip this if you need managed services or a vendor that handles tuning and threat hunting for you; a twelve-person vendor running open-source Zeek means you're responsible for keeping detection rules sharp.

Exabeam NetMon

Mid-market and enterprise security ops teams that struggle to spot lateral movement and data exfiltration in encrypted traffic should prioritize Exabeam NetMon. Its network traffic analysis catches what endpoint tools miss, and the dual NIST coverage in Continuous Monitoring and Adverse Event Analysis shows real depth in both detection and investigation. Skip this if your network is mostly cloud-native with minimal east-west traffic; NetMon assumes a hybrid environment where network packets still tell the story.