Clerk vs Evo Security IAM Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Clerk: Authentication and user management platform with pre-built UI components. built by Clerk. Core capabilities include Pre-built authentication UI components (SignUp, SignIn, UserButton, UserProfile), Organization management components (CreateOrganization, OrganizationSwitcher, OrganizationProfile, OrganizationList), Multi-tenant organization support..

Evo Security IAM Platform: Multi-tenant IAM platform for MSPs with MFA, SSO, PAM, and RADIUS. built by Evo Security. Core capabilities include Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for endpoints, servers, and admin accounts, Single Sign-On (SSO) across web applications, Managed RADIUS authentication for VPN and firewall access..

Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Clerk differentiates with Pre-built authentication UI components (SignUp, SignIn, UserButton, UserProfile), Organization management components (CreateOrganization, OrganizationSwitcher, OrganizationProfile, OrganizationList), Multi-tenant organization support. Evo Security IAM Platform differentiates with Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for endpoints, servers, and admin accounts, Single Sign-On (SSO) across web applications, Managed RADIUS authentication for VPN and firewall access.

Clerk is developed by Clerk. Evo Security IAM Platform is developed by Evo Security. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Clerk and Evo Security IAM Platform serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover MFA, SSO, Multi Tenancy. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.