eMudhra SecurePass IAM vs OpenIAM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
eMudhra SecurePass IAM is a commercial identity governance and administration tool by eMudhra. OpenIAM is a free identity governance and administration tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best identity governance and administration fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise organizations with hybrid infrastructure need eMudhra SecurePass IAM primarily for its IGA and PAM integration; most IAM platforms force you to bolt on PAM separately or accept weaker credential controls, but this tool handles both natively across cloud and on-premises in one deployment. The vendor's 929-person scale and established compliance certifications (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) mean you get mature audit trails without the six-month implementation tax of larger platforms. Skip this if your primary driver is frictionless employee authentication; the Zero Trust adaptive layer is competent but not where the product's real teeth are.
Mid-market organizations building internal developer platforms or modernizing legacy identity infrastructure will find OpenIAM's free tier valuable for piloting identity governance without license friction. The platform bundles CIAM, MFA, and PAM capabilities in a single deployment, which is rare at the free tier and sidesteps the typical vendor compartmentalization. Skip this if you need deep integration with your existing IAM stack or require vendor support SLAs; OpenIAM's community-driven model means you're debugging with forums, not escalation paths.
