EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs Owl DiOTa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0: OT-native zero-trust platform with device-level access control for IIoT. built by EasySec Solutions. Core capabilities include Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions..

Owl DiOTa: Compact data diode for secure one-way data transfers in OT environments. built by owl cyber. Core capabilities include One-way data transfer enforcement, Hardware-based data diode technology, Designed for OT network security..

Both serve the OT Network Segmentation market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 differentiates with Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions. Owl DiOTa differentiates with One-way data transfer enforcement, Hardware-based data diode technology, Designed for OT network security.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 is developed by EasySec Solutions. Owl DiOTa is developed by owl cyber. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 and Owl DiOTa serve similar OT Network Segmentation use cases: both are OT Network Segmentation tools, both cover Network Segmentation, SCADA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.