Dragos OT Incident Response vs Galvanick XD/OT: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Dragos OT Incident Response

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams will get the most from Dragos OT Incident Response because it treats ICS incident response as a distinct discipline rather than bolting detection onto IT playbooks; the WorldView threat intelligence with weekly Knowledge Packs and expert-authored playbooks mean your analysts aren't improvising response procedures for unfamiliar environments. The platform covers the full arc from continuous monitoring through case management and forensic reconstruction, anchored by NIST Detect and Response functions that actually matter in control system emergencies. Skip this if your priority is prevention rather than forensics; Dragos prioritizes investigation depth over blocking at ingress.

Galvanick XD/OT

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting critical infrastructure will get the most from Galvanick XD/OT because it deploys without touching running OT systems, a constraint that kills most EDR tools in this space. Silent data extraction and non-disruptive monitoring cover the full asset inventory while the platform normalizes alerts from both OT and IT sources into a single pane, addressing the fragmentation that leaves gaps in visibility. Skip this if you need deep forensics and recovery automation; Galvanick prioritizes detection and asset mapping over incident response workflows, which means your team still owns the investigation work downstream.