Dockerscan vs kube-bench: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Dockerscan is a free container security tool. kube-bench is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Development teams running Docker in lab or early-stage environments should start with Dockerscan because it's free and requires no setup to scan your images and running containers for known vulnerabilities. The 1,531 GitHub stars indicate solid adoption among engineers who want quick local feedback before pushing to registry, not a replacement for runtime security in production. Skip this if you need network segmentation analysis or compliance reporting; Dockerscan does vulnerability scanning well and stops there.
Teams running Kubernetes who need to know whether their cluster configuration actually matches CIS Benchmark standards should start with kube-bench; it's free, it runs locally, and it will catch misconfigurations that most teams have never audited. The tool covers 93 checks across control plane, node, and policies, which means you'll find real gaps in RBAC, network policies, and pod security posture in your first run. Skip this if you need continuous runtime monitoring or remediation automation; kube-bench is a point-in-time scanner that tells you what's broken, not what's attacking you.
