Digital Type vs Innerworks: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Digital Type is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by TNK. Innerworks is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by Innerworks. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best user and entity behavior analytics fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startup security teams managing insider risk without dedicated headcount should start with Digital Type, since its behavioral science layer catches risky user patterns that traditional access controls miss. The platform covers five NIST CSF 2.0 areas including continuous monitoring and risk assessment, and deployment takes weeks not months on cloud infrastructure. Skip this if you need deep forensics or incident response automation; Digital Type is built for prevention and early warning, not post-breach investigation.
Mid-market and enterprise teams fighting account takeover and synthetic fraud will find Innerworks valuable for its device fingerprinting and real-time behavioral linking across login attempts, capabilities that catch credential stuffing attacks most SIEM vendors miss. The RedTeam synthetic attack engine lets you validate detection tuning without waiting for live incidents, and the tool covers four of five NIST ID/DE functions, showing strength in asset identification and continuous monitoring. Skip this if you need deep post-breach investigation or forensic playback; Innerworks is built for prevention and compliance enforcement, not incident response archaeology.
