Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) vs Damn Vulnerable Web Services: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is a free cyber range training tool. Damn Vulnerable Web Services is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security engineers and students building Linux exploitation skills need Damn Vulnerable Linux because it gives you a sandbox where every vulnerability is deliberately exposed and documented, eliminating the guesswork of "is this actually exploitable or am I missing something." The OS includes over 20 intentional weaknesses across privilege escalation, web apps, and local services, each mapped to real CVEs so your training translates to actual threat hunting. Skip this if your team needs a cloud-native range or role-based labs; DVL is bare-metal Linux practice, nothing more.
Security teams building internal training programs or running capture-the-flag exercises need Damn Vulnerable Web Services because it's free and maintains a working lab environment without licensing friction or infrastructure overhead. The project has sustained community contributions across 456 GitHub stars and covers multiple OWASP Top 10 categories, giving practitioners real vulnerable code to dissect rather than theoretical scenarios. Skip this if your goal is learning to defend production APIs; Damn Vulnerable Web Services is deliberately broken in ways that don't map cleanly to modern cloud architectures or async service patterns.
