Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
ctlogs.dev is a commercial external attack surface management tool by Apps34. SpiderFoot is a free external attack surface management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best external attack surface management fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
Based on our analysis of core features, integrations, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams tasked with mapping their external attack surface on a shoestring budget should start with SpiderFoot; its free tier and 16,981 GitHub stars mean you get legitimate OSINT automation without vendor lock-in or seat licensing. The tool excels at reconnaissance and passive data collection, letting small to mid-market teams discover exposed assets and third-party risks they didn't know existed. Skip this if your team needs active vulnerability scanning or remediation workflows; SpiderFoot is reconnaissance fuel, not a vulnerability management platform.
Fast Certificate Transparency search and JSON API for subdomain reconnaissance.
Automate OSINT for threat intelligence and attack surface mapping with SpiderFoot.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPExplore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing ctlogs.dev vs SpiderFoot for your external attack surface management needs.
ctlogs.dev: Fast Certificate Transparency search and JSON API for subdomain reconnaissance. built by Apps34. Core capabilities include Real-time Certificate Transparency Search, Automated Subdomain Enumeration, High-Performance REST JSON API..
SpiderFoot: Automate OSINT for threat intelligence and attack surface mapping with SpiderFoot..
Both serve the External Attack Surface Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
ctlogs.dev is developed by Apps34. SpiderFoot is open-source with 16,981 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
ctlogs.dev and SpiderFoot serve similar External Attack Surface Management use cases: both are External Attack Surface Management tools, both cover Osint. Key differences: ctlogs.dev is Commercial while SpiderFoot is Free, SpiderFoot is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox