CSPi Myricom nVoy Series AIR vs Menlo Security Browsing Forensics: 2026 Comparison

CSPi Myricom nVoy Series AIR

Enterprise and mid-market IR teams investigating breaches need the nVoy Series AIR to turn alert noise into forensic evidence; it automatically matches your firewall and IDS alerts to actual network traffic, then pulls the full conversation files on demand so you're not reconstructing timelines from logs. Continuous 24/7 capture at 10Gbps with real-time indexing means you can retrieve retroactive proof of compromise for assets you define as critical, covering NIST Detect and Respond functions equally well. Skip this if your team lacks dedicated forensic analysts or if you need detection tuning beyond ingesting alerts; nVoy assumes your alerts are mostly good and focuses on proving what actually happened on the wire.

Menlo Security Browsing Forensics

Incident response teams investigating browser-based attacks and insider threats need Menlo Security Browsing Forensics because it reconstructs exactly what happened in a user session,keystrokes, GenAI tool interactions, and all,without relying on fragmented logs or user memory. The keyboard capture and video-like replay directly support NIST RS.AN incident analysis, turning forensic friction into a timeline you can actually audit. Skip this if your organization rarely investigates user sessions or lacks the cloud infrastructure to store encrypted recordings at scale; browser forensics only matters if you're actually going to use it.