tryharder vs CobaltBus: 2026 Comparison
tryharder is a free offensive security tool. CobaltBus is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running Sliver or custom shellcode payloads will get the most from tryharder because its staged loader actually evades common memory inspection hooks that off-the-shelf loaders fail against. The 97 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real operators are shipping this in engagements, which is more meaningful than a vendor benchmark here. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks or C2 infrastructure; tryharder does one thing, loader evasion, and stops there.
Red teams running Azure-native infrastructure need CobaltBus because it hides Cobalt Strike traffic inside Service Bus messages, eliminating the need for external C2 domains that network monitoring catches. The free pricing and 246 GitHub stars signal active maintenance by practitioners who understand both Azure specifics and operator workflow. Skip this if your organization lacks Azure environments or prefers commercial red team frameworks with vendor support; CobaltBus demands hands-on Azure knowledge to deploy safely.
