Conjur OSS vs Crypto4A QxVault™: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Conjur OSS: Open source secrets mgmt tool for non-human access control via RBAC. built by Conjur. Core capabilities include Secrets storage and secure distribution to applications, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for non-human identities, Application authentication prior to secret access..

Crypto4A QxVault™: Secrets management vault with built-in FIPS 140-3 HSM for on-prem/private cloud. built by Crypto4A. Core capabilities include Built-in FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSM (pending validation), Secure encrypted storage of key/value secrets, Dynamic secret generation with automatic lease-based revocation..

Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Conjur OSS differentiates with Secrets storage and secure distribution to applications, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for non-human identities, Application authentication prior to secret access. Crypto4A QxVault™ differentiates with Built-in FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSM (pending validation), Secure encrypted storage of key/value secrets, Dynamic secret generation with automatic lease-based revocation.

Conjur OSS is developed by Conjur. Crypto4A QxVault™ is developed by Crypto4A. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Conjur OSS integrates with Ansible, AWS, Cloud Foundry, Jenkins, Kubernetes and 1 more. Crypto4A QxVault™ integrates with OpenBAO, Kubernetes, SQL databases. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

Conjur OSS and Crypto4A QxVault™ serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover Secrets Management, PAM, Kubernetes. Key differences: Conjur OSS is Free while Crypto4A QxVault™ is Commercial. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.