Conceal Secure SaaS Access vs Keep Aware: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Conceal Secure SaaS Access

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in SaaS sprawl need Conceal Secure SaaS Access primarily for its ability to enforce zero trust on browser traffic without deploying agents or proxies, which eliminates the deployment friction that kills most browser security projects. The platform scores across PR.AA, PR.DS, and DE.CM in NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it actually locks down access, protects data in motion, and gives you visibility into what's happening; cloud-native deployment makes this achievable in weeks, not quarters. Skip this if your concern is post-breach forensics or you need deep integration with your SIEM; Conceal is built for prevention and real-time blocking, not investigation.

Keep Aware

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in browser-based threats will benefit most from Keep Aware's agentless deployment directly into existing browsers, which eliminates the infrastructure overhead of proxies or tunneling that slow down other DLP tools. The platform delivers strong coverage across NIST PR.DS and PR.PS, with real-time visibility into extensions and data transfers that catch info-stealers and credential theft at the point of click. Skip this if your organization needs endpoint detection beyond the browser or requires deep integration with your existing EDR stack; Keep Aware is deliberately browser-scoped, not a replacement for host-based monitoring.