Com Olho Bug Bounty Program vs Intigriti Live Hacking Event: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Com Olho Bug Bounty Program

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that want to outsource vulnerability discovery without building an internal bug bounty operation should evaluate Com Olho Bug Bounty Program; its strength lies in researcher reward management and continuous assessment across web applications, APIs, and infrastructure, not just one attack surface. The platform maps directly to NIST ID.RA and ID.AM, meaning you get structured risk discovery tied to your actual asset inventory rather than ad-hoc findings. Skip this if you need a managed security testing service with guaranteed SLAs or if your organization lacks the internal capacity to triage and remediate reported bugs quickly; Com Olho works best when you have security staff ready to act on inbound disclosures.

Intigriti Live Hacking Event

Mid-market and enterprise security teams looking to validate their risk posture against real attacker behavior should run Intigriti Live Hacking Event once annually. The vetted researcher pool and time-bound format compress months of traditional penetration testing into a single event, forcing your team to triage actual findings fast rather than drowning in reports. Skip this if your organization needs continuous vulnerability discovery; live events are snapshots, not ongoing coverage, and they won't replace your bug bounty program or red team retainers.