Codenotary AgentX vs Oso: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Codenotary AgentX is a commercial agentic ai security tool by Codenotary. Oso is a commercial agentic ai security tool by Oso. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best agentic ai security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security and DevOps teams automating incident response across hybrid infrastructure should pick Codenotary AgentX for its ability to let AI agents execute privileged commands safely through command whitelisting and real-time risk scoring. The platform covers the full security orchestration cycle from detection through investigation with 40+ MCP tools, SSH session correlation for forensics, and compliance tagging for SOX and PCI-DSS. This is not the tool for organizations needing broad endpoint detection and response; AgentX is purpose-built for automation of known playbooks, not threat hunting or behavioral analysis at scale.
Teams deploying AI coding agents at scale need visibility into what those models are actually doing, and Oso is built specifically for that job rather than retrofitting general security tools. It covers the full cycle: PR.AA controls around agent access, DE.CM continuous monitoring of agent behavior, and RS.AN incident analysis when things go wrong. Skip this if your AI footprint is experimental or single-use; Oso assumes you're running agents in production where audit trails and control enforcement matter.
