CloudMask Secure Gmail vs Egress Protect: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CloudMask Secure Gmail: End-to-end Gmail encryption with user-controlled keys and trusted contacts. built by CloudMask. Core capabilities include One-click end-to-end encryption of Gmail subject and body, Automatic encryption of email attachments including file names, User-controlled encryption keys (zero-knowledge to CloudMask)..

Egress Protect: End-to-end email encryption with DLP and access controls for Microsoft 365. built by Egress. Core capabilities include End-to-end email encryption with 256-bit AES, Automatic and sender-initiated encryption based on policies, Granular access controls to restrict forwarding, printing, copying, and downloading..

Both serve the Email Encryption market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

CloudMask Secure Gmail differentiates with One-click end-to-end encryption of Gmail subject and body, Automatic encryption of email attachments including file names, User-controlled encryption keys (zero-knowledge to CloudMask). Egress Protect differentiates with End-to-end email encryption with 256-bit AES, Automatic and sender-initiated encryption based on policies, Granular access controls to restrict forwarding, printing, copying, and downloading.

CloudMask Secure Gmail is developed by CloudMask. Egress Protect is developed by Egress. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

CloudMask Secure Gmail integrates with Gmail. Egress Protect integrates with Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office 365, Outlook, Outlook Web Access, Microsoft Purview Information Protection and 3 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

CloudMask Secure Gmail and Egress Protect serve similar Email Encryption use cases: both are Email Encryption tools, both cover Encryption. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.