CloudCopy vs Pacu: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
CloudCopy is a free penetration testing tool. Pacu is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers targeting AWS environments with on-premises Active Directory should use CloudCopy to extract domain credentials from cloud-hosted domain controllers without agent deployment or credential interception. The tool's implementation of the Shadow Copy attack via EBS snapshots works against a specific, high-value target that most cloud offense tooling ignores. Skip this if your scope excludes AWS infrastructure or if you're looking for post-exploitation credential access beyond domain hashes.
Red teamers and cloud security engineers who need to validate AWS IAM misconfigurations will find Pacu's modular attack chains faster to customize than commercial frameworks, since you can fork the codebase directly. The 4,883 GitHub stars reflect active community contribution and real-world validation against common cloud privilege escalation paths. Skip this if your team lacks AWS-specific offensive knowledge or needs a guided UI; Pacu rewards practitioners who can read Python and chain attacks manually.
