Cloud Security Alliance AI Controls Matrix vs Reflectiz DORA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cloud Security Alliance AI Controls Matrix

Security teams building AI systems need the Cloud Security Alliance AI Controls Matrix to map their control gaps against 243 objectives already cross-referenced to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF 1.0, and the EU AI Act; this saves months of duplicative framework reconciliation work. The 18 security domains with threat categorization and LLM lifecycle analysis directly address NIST CSF 2.0's Platform Security and Data Security functions in ways generic compliance tools simply don't. Skip this if your organization isn't actively developing or deploying generative AI; the controls are purpose-built for that use case and won't translate cleanly to traditional application security programs.

Reflectiz DORA

Financial services firms subject to DORA who need visibility into third-party scripts and trackers without touching production should use Reflectiz DORA; the agentless remote scanning model eliminates the deployment friction that kills compliance tool adoption at mid-market banks. Coverage across GV.SC supply chain risk and PR.DS data security aligns directly with DORA's ICT risk and consent-tracking requirements, and the Privacy Dashboard catches unauthorized data exfiltration through scripts that traditional network tools ignore. Skip this if your organization has already mapped third-party dependencies through your CMDB or if you need endpoint detection; Reflectiz is single-purpose and won't replace your broader risk inventory.