Cloud Range vs Immersive Labs Cyber Drills: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cloud Range

SOC and IR teams that need hands-on attack simulation without building physical infrastructure should run Cloud Range; the cloud-hosted private network environment eliminates months of lab setup while the flexible subscription tiers let you scale from individual contributor drills to enterprise-wide exercises. Coverage of PR.AT (awareness and training) and ID.IM (improvement) under NIST CSF 2.0 reflects strong capability in skill-building and process refinement, backed by instructor-led, self-service, and Train the Trainer delivery options. Skip this if your priority is integrating live-fire training into an existing purple team workflow; Cloud Range is built for standalone SOC and IR skill development rather than cross-functional threat simulation.

Immersive Labs Cyber Drills

Security leaders who need to validate incident response speed across SOC, legal, PR, and executive teams should run Immersive Labs Cyber Drills; tabletop simulations alone won't catch the communication breakdowns and decision delays that live coordinated attacks expose. The tool covers NIST RS.CO (incident response reporting and coordination) thoroughly, with cross-functional benchmarking that forces real accountability, and supports both synchronous drills and asynchronous formats for distributed teams. Skip this if your incident response plan hasn't been documented yet or if you're still hiring your first SOC analyst; you'll get more value from foundational IR playbooks first.