Cisco Duo Remote Access vs Keypasco ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cisco Duo Remote Access is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Duo Security. Keypasco ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Keypasco. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams managing hybrid workforces across multiple cloud platforms will find Cisco Duo Remote Access valuable for its phishing-resistant authentication, which eliminates the weakest link in most remote access breaches. The solution enforces device trust verification before access is granted, addressing PR.AA identity controls that most VPN replacements handle poorly. Skip this if your organization needs deep network segmentation or advanced threat hunting; Duo prioritizes access decisions over post-breach detection and monitoring.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with true zero trust will find Keypasco ZTNA's identity-first access model genuinely simpler to operate than products that bolt trust onto existing network boundaries. The cloud-native deployment and strong NIST PR.AA coverage on identity and access control mean you're not managing IP whitelists or implicit trust zones; you're controlling who gets what, period. Skip this if you need on-premises deployment or a vendor with deep integration into existing SIEM and ticketing stacks; Keypasco's 20-person team prioritizes the core access problem over ecosystem coverage.
