Cigent Pre-Boot Authentication (PBA) vs Cigent SSD UxV: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cigent Pre-Boot Authentication (PBA)

Enterprise and mid-market security teams protecting classified data or high-value intellectual property should evaluate Cigent Pre-Boot Authentication for its NSA CSfC DAR compliance, which bakes dual-layer encryption (hardware and software) into the boot process itself, eliminating the window where unencrypted access is possible. The solution covers NIST PR.AA authentication controls with multi-factor options including PIV smartcards and security keys, and achieves FIPS 140-2/3 certification across Intel, AMD, and ARM platforms. Skip this if your threat model doesn't require pre-OS-load protection or if you need integrated endpoint detection and response; Cigent does one thing defensively and does it to spec, not a platform play.

Cigent SSD UxV

Enterprise security teams protecting classified or high-sensitivity data on field devices need Cigent SSD UxV for its firmware-locked storage ranges that defeat chip-off and forensic extraction attacks, something software-only encryption cannot stop. FIPS 140-2 certification and dual-layer CSfC-aligned encryption (hardware AES-256 plus software FDE) mean the tool satisfies the most stringent compliance mandates without compromise. This is purpose-built for UxV platforms in defense or intelligence contexts; organizations with standard laptop fleets or those prioritizing remote management flexibility over hardware-level tamper resistance will find better ROI elsewhere.