Cigent SSD ICS Data Protection vs genua Remote Maintenance: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cigent SSD ICS Data Protection

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams protecting critical infrastructure from data exfiltration need Cigent SSD ICS Data Protection because it enforces encryption and erasure at the firmware level, making data unrecoverable even if adversaries gain physical access to drives. The dual-layer encryption aligns with NSA Commercial Solutions for Classified requirements, and the patented block-by-block verified erasure actually proves deletion rather than assuming it. Skip this if your threat model is primarily logical access and insider threat; Cigent's value is defending against nation-state adversaries and sophisticated theft of ICS artifacts, not preventing lateral movement across your network.

genua Remote Maintenance

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed maintenance access across critical industrial networks should pick genua Remote Maintenance because it enforces Zero Trust at the remote session layer, not just at the perimeter. The vendor's Security by Design architecture and explicit support for privileged access management mean you're not bolting trust controls onto a legacy remote tool. This is not for organizations seeking a single pane of glass across IT and OT security; genua focuses narrowly on the remote maintenance use case and assumes you already have asset monitoring and detection tooling in place.