Axiom Cyber HakTrap vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Axiom Cyber HakTrap

SMB and startup security teams protecting consumer-grade networks will get the most from Axiom Cyber HakTrap because it handles IoT and smart home device threats at the network perimeter without requiring per-device agents. The device processes over 1 Gbps of throughput and receives 150+ threat intelligence updates daily, covering ransomware, DDoS, and cryptojacking across 350,000 threat data points. This is not the tool for organizations needing advanced threat hunting, forensics, or recovery capabilities; HakTrap prioritizes detection and blocking over the investigative depth larger companies demand.

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with hybrid cloud footprints should pick Trellix Intrusion Prevention System for its dual signature-and-behavior detection engine, which catches both known threats and zero-days in motion; the integrated sandboxing via Trellix IVX dynamic analysis engine and native ML correlation with Trellix NDR gives you incident confidence most IPS vendors force you to bolt on separately. The AWS and Azure Gateway Load Balancer integrations mean you can actually deploy this across cloud workloads without architectural gymnastics. Skip this if you're prioritizing incident response automation and recovery workflows; Trellix is detection and blocking heavy, light on the post-compromise investigation layer.