AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs NetApp Backup and Recovery: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Teams running mission-critical applications on AWS who need sub-hour recovery times without buying dedicated disaster recovery infrastructure should start here; AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery eliminates the capital expense of standby hardware by recovering directly into AWS at scale, and the free tier lets you test failover before committing. The service handles continuous replication of on-premises and cloud servers, so your RTO is limited by your network throughput, not your backup window. Skip this if your applications live outside AWS or if you need orchestrated failover across multiple cloud regions; Elastic Disaster Recovery is AWS-centric by design.

NetApp Backup and Recovery

Mid-market and enterprise organizations with hybrid cloud infrastructure will get the most from NetApp Backup and Recovery because it handles multicloud backup without forcing you to rip out existing ONTAP investments. NetApp Console ties backup operations directly to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud alongside on-premises arrays, and the Ransomware Resilience data service addresses recovery planning that most pure backup vendors skip entirely. This isn't the tool for teams whose backups live entirely in one public cloud or who need SaaS-only simplicity; NetApp's strength comes from managing complexity across multiple storage tiers and clouds, which creates operational overhead for smaller deployments.