Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
AuthZed is a commercial access management tool by AuthZed. Keycloak is a commercial access management tool by keycloak. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best access management fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and mid-market teams building custom applications need Keycloak because it's open-source IAM you can actually modify without vendor lock-in, and self-host it on infrastructure you already control. The tool supports OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML protocols out of the box, plus passkey-based MFA and multi-tenancy through its Organizations feature, covering NIST CSF 2.0's Identity Management function without licensing per user. Skip this if your organization needs managed SaaS convenience and hands-off operations; Keycloak requires DevOps capacity to deploy, patch, and maintain in production.
Centralized authorization platform for fine-grained permissions at scale.
Open-source IAM solution for SSO, MFA, and identity federation
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing AuthZed vs Keycloak for your access management needs.
AuthZed: Centralized authorization platform for fine-grained permissions at scale. built by AuthZed. Core capabilities include Centralized permission definition and enforcement across all services, Relationship-based access control (ReBAC) modeled on Google Zanzibar, Flexible schema language for defining and updating permission models..
Keycloak: Open-source IAM solution for SSO, MFA, and identity federation. built by keycloak. Core capabilities include Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication with passkeys and recovery codes, Identity federation with external providers..
Both serve the Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
AuthZed differentiates with Centralized permission definition and enforcement across all services, Relationship-based access control (ReBAC) modeled on Google Zanzibar, Flexible schema language for defining and updating permission models. Keycloak differentiates with Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication with passkeys and recovery codes, Identity federation with external providers.
AuthZed is developed by AuthZed. Keycloak is developed by keycloak. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
AuthZed and Keycloak serve similar Access Management use cases: both are Access Management tools, both cover Authorization, Open Source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox