asvin Risk by Context vs Quantara AI Continuous Assessment: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

asvin Risk by Context

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing converged IT/OT environments will get the most from asvin Risk by Context because it actually contextualizes vulnerability severity against your business topology instead of just regurgitating CVSS scores. The platform covers five critical NIST CSF 2.0 functions from organizational context through asset management and risk assessment, which matters because it forces you to map dependencies before deciding what to patch first. Skip this if your organization runs single-layer IT infrastructure or relies on your SIEM to handle risk prioritization; the real value emerges when you have multiple business-critical systems with opaque interconnections that generic scoring tools miss.

Quantara AI Continuous Assessment

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in control assessment spreadsheets will get immediate value from Quantara AI Continuous Assessment because it replaces manual compliance mapping with automated ingestion across your existing tool stack, turning siloed security data into financial risk figures that actually move budget conversations. The platform covers five critical NIST CSF 2.0 functions including organizational context and risk strategy, meaning your board gets language they understand instead of maturity scores. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 200 employees or hasn't centralized your Splunk, Tenable, and CrowdStrike data yet; the ROI math only works once you have enough control surface to quantify.